Linkspam: November 1st, 2013

Every Friday, we will share links to news, blogs, and anything else we find interesting.  We can’t catch everything, so you are invited to self-promote in the comments!

The Transcending Boundaries blog hosted an article on asexuality for AAW.

The Ace Theist has some thoughts on skolioromanticism.

Queer as Cat posted an asexuality FAQ video for AAW.

Early to Bed (a sex shop) made a round-up of sex toys for AAW.  (NSFW)

ace-muslim has some thoughts on ace activism properly reflecting the composition of the community.

Here’s part two and part three of the Ace Awareness Fanworks.

A writer talks about looming dating difficulties in their life.

Someone wrote an ebook called “What Do You Mean You’re Not Interested in Sex?: American Life and Law from an Asexual Perspective.”

nextstepcake addresses the question of whether grey-aces and demisexuals should be considered asexual.

oceann-eyess wrote about what it means to be grey-sexual.

Adri of the Dead drew a comic for AAW.

Here’s a research study on asexual men AMAB people that’s looking for participants.

About queenieofaces

QueenieOfAces is a graduate student in the U.S. studying Japanese religion. She is a queer asexual. She also blogs over at Concept Awesome and runs Resources for Ace Survivors. She is never quite sure what to write in these introduction things, but this one time she accidentally got a short story on asexuality published in an erotica magazine.
This entry was posted in Linkspam. Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Linkspam: November 1st, 2013

  1. Midori Skies says:

    The study on “male asexuality” is for natal males. You might want to make note of that in the post, before any other trans men click on the link just to have their gender invalidated.

  2. Midori Skies says:

    No, wait, apparently it’s a study for trans women, too, as the eligibility question just asks if you are AMAB (though the actual, incredibly cissexist, wording is “Were you born as an anatomical male?”). I’m sure all the ace trans women will be delighted to hear that they qualify to participate in a study on “male asexuality” /sarcasm

  3. Pingback: Cissexism in Scientific Studies | midoriskies

  4. I took that survey a couple of weeks ago. The questions in it were weird. You indicate that you’re an aromantic asexual, then are later faced with questions about “your preferred sex”, which it defines as “refers to individuals of the sex or sexes that you are sexually and/or romantically attracted to”.

    Um, what part of “aromantic asexual” did you misunderstand?

    And then, out of nowhere, it asked a series of questions about getting aroused by “your nude female body”. Because, apparently, “anatomical males” really all have “nude female bodies”?

    I also recall a sort of menu of sexual activities, and I think you had to rate them as “arousing” or “disgusting”. For most of them, I don’t think of them as either arousing or disgusting, because I simply don’t think of them at all.

    And then it asked if I’d find it sexually arousing to expose my genitals to strangers or spy on people taking showers.

    Yeah, I totally want to have my privates hooked up to a machine and be forced to watch porn by people who run a survey like that.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s